Kay Beauty, HRX, 82°E, and other celebrity-led ventures show how Indian stars are taking a more active role in building brands. From beauty and fitness to self-care, these businesses combine celebrity influence with products, positioning, and long-term involvement instead of relying only on a famous face.
Your information is safe with us
For years, putting a Bollywood star next to a product was one of the easiest ways for a brand to get attention in India. A familiar face could make an advertisement stand out, create instant recognition, and give a new product a sense of familiarity. The logic was simple: people know the celebrity, so they may notice the brand.
That still works to an extent. Star power remains a strong marketing tool, particularly in a country where cinema and celebrity culture have a huge influence on popular culture. But attention and business success are not the same thing.
Consumers today have more ways to research a product before buying it. They can compare prices, read reviews, watch product demonstrations, follow creators, check ingredients, and hear from other customers. A celebrity may encourage someone to try something, but that first purchase does not guarantee another one. If the product is expensive, ineffective, difficult to use, or not clearly different from competing choices, fame cannot keep the customer coming back.
The change can also be seen in the way celebrities themselves are approaching business. Some stars are no longer interested in simply appearing in an advertisement. They are becoming founders, investors, co-creators, and long-term brand partners. Katrina Kaif's involvement with Kay Beauty, Hrithik Roshan's connection with HRX, and Deepika Padukone's role as a founder of 82°E show how celebrity influence can become part of a larger business strategy.
This does not mean celebrity endorsements are becoming irrelevant. It means their job is changing.
A famous face can still open the door. What happens after the door opens depends on the product, its positioning, its price, the customer experience, and the credibility of the person recommending it.
The Indian celebrity-brand relationship is therefore moving from a simple exchange of fame for visibility towards something more demanding. The star may bring attention, but the brand has to give consumers a reason to stay.
A celebrity can influence the decision to try a product, but repeat purchases require something more.
Celebrity endorsements work because familiarity reduces the effort needed to notice a new product. When a recognised actor introduces a product, consumers may be more willing to stop and pay attention than they would be to an unknown brand.
This can be particularly useful when a product is entering a crowded category. A new skincare product, beverage, fashion label or food brand has to compete for attention with many established choices. A popular celebrity can give the launch a strong starting point.
But that advantage is mostly concentrated around awareness and consideration. The consumer may think, "This person uses or recommends it, so I should check it out." That can be enough to drive a search, a store visit or a first purchase. The next decision is different.
Once someone has bought the product, the celebrity is no longer holding the entire conversation. The consumer now has direct experience with the product. Was the quality good? Did it perform as promised? Was the price justified? Would they buy it again?
That is where celebrity influence starts giving way to product experience.
The difference between trial and loyalty is important for celebrity-led brands. Imagine a celebrity promoting a new skincare product. Their popularity may persuade thousands of people to try it. But if customers do not like the texture, packaging, performance or value, the next purchase is unlikely to come from the celebrity's popularity alone.
The same applies to fashion, food, fitness products and personal care. A star can create curiosity, but consumers eventually judge the product on its own terms. This is why strong celebrity-led businesses need more than marketing budgets. They need product development, distribution, customer service, pricing and a clear reason for consumers to choose them again.
The celebrity may help shorten the path to the first purchase. Product quality has to keep that relationship alive.
A celebrity can make a product visible to a large audience, but visibility does not tell a brand whether the product actually fits the market. A successful product has to meet a real consumer need at a price people are willing to pay. It also needs to stand apart from alternatives.
Kay Beauty offers a useful example of this model. Katrina Kaif did not simply attach her name to a makeup line. The brand was built around a specific proposition involving high-performance makeup, skincare-orientated ingredients and products designed with diverse Indian beauty needs in mind. It was launched in 2019 as a partnership between Kaif and Nykaa.
The distinction matters because the business has something to communicate beyond the founder's celebrity status. The star can attract attention, but the product proposition gives consumers a reason to evaluate the brand.
One of the biggest changes in celebrity branding is the movement from endorsement to ownership.
An actor appearing in an advertisement can finish the campaign after the shoot. A founder cannot take the same approach. A founder has to think about products, customers, positioning, hiring, distribution, finances and long-term growth.
That difference changes how celebrity influence works. When the celebrity has a stake in the business, their public image becomes connected to the product in a more lasting way. They have more reason to understand what the company stands for and how customers experience it.
This does not automatically make a celebrity-led business successful. But it creates a stronger link between the person's reputation and the business itself.
Katrina Kaif's journey with Kay Beauty is one of the clearer examples of this change in India. The brand was developed with Kaif as a co-founder rather than treating her only as an advertising face. Kay Beauty's positioning has focused on inclusive beauty, makeup performance and products developed with skincare-related considerations. Kaif has also spoken about building a beauty community and making different consumers feel represented.
The business has since moved beyond a launch campaign. By 2025, Kay Beauty had reported an annualised GMV run rate of more than ₹350 crore, according to Nykaa's investor communication, and the brand had expanded beyond India. The important lesson is not simply that a celebrity created a successful brand.
It is that celebrity involvement was combined with a defined category proposition and a business structure capable of supporting the brand beyond the initial launch.
HRX offers another Indian example, but its route is different. Hrithik Roshan's public image has long been connected with fitness, discipline and physical performance. HRX turned those associations into a broader lifestyle proposition covering areas such as sportswear and fitness.
The brand's own history describes its journey around motivation, perseverance and a fitness-led lifestyle, showing how the celebrity's existing public identity became part of the brand's larger positioning. This is different from simply placing Hrithik in an advertisement for an unrelated product.
The brand has a natural connection with the space in which consumers already expect to see him. That makes the association easier to understand. The wider lesson is that celebrity-owned or celebrity-led brands have a better starting point when the category fits what the celebrity is already known for.
Consumers are now exposed to celebrities outside traditional advertisements. They see interviews, social posts, product launches, behind-the-scenes content and personal opinions. This makes it harder to maintain a completely separate advertising persona.
A celebrity may promote beauty products one week, a financial product the next and a snack after that. Each individual campaign may reach millions of people, but repeated unrelated endorsements can weaken the connection between the person and the product.
The issue is not that celebrities should only endorse one category. The issue is credibility. If the connection between the celebrity and the product feels weak, consumers may see the campaign as a paid promotion rather than a genuine recommendation. That distinction matters more when brands are asking people to trust claims about health, finance, beauty, fitness or performance.
A celebrity's own experience can make a product story more convincing when it is relevant and genuine. For example, Katrina Kaif's experience working with makeup during long film shoots gave her a practical reason to think about long-wearing makeup and skin comfort. She has described that experience as part of the thinking behind Kay Beauty.
The value here is not simply that she is famous. It is that her professional life exposed her to a product problem. That creates a stronger starting point for entrepreneurship than simply deciding to put a celebrity's name on a product because their face is recognisable.
Authenticity does not mean every celebrity needs to become a technical expert. It means the celebrity should have a believable role.
A sportsperson can bring lived experience to fitness. An actor who has worked extensively with makeup can contribute to beauty products. A celebrity known for a particular lifestyle can have a natural connection to fashion, food, travel or wellness. For technical areas, brands should also rely on qualified professionals and product teams.
The celebrity can be the public face and founder, while specialists handle formulation, testing, research, manufacturing and compliance. That combination can create a stronger business than celebrity influence alone.
The modern consumer does not have to accept an advertisement at face value.
Before buying a product, consumers can compare multiple options within minutes. They can check reviews, ingredient lists, specifications, prices and customer experiences. They can also watch people demonstrate how a product works.
This means the celebrity is entering a decision process that already contains a lot of information. The star may get the consumer's attention, but the product has to survive comparison.
This is particularly important in categories where performance is easy to judge. Beauty products can be tested. Fitness products can be evaluated. Food can be tasted. Fashion can be worn. A famous person cannot hide a weak product forever.
Younger consumers are comfortable following celebrities, but they also follow creators, experts and niche communities. A person does not have to be a film star to influence a buying decision.
A makeup creator can demonstrate a foundation. A fitness coach can explain a training product. A dermatologist can discuss skincare ingredients. A food creator can show how a product is used.
These people may have smaller audiences than a major Bollywood actor, but their relationship with the audience can be more specific. For brands, this creates a more complex marketing environment.
The question is no longer only, "How famous is this person?"
It is also, "Why should this audience believe this person about this particular product?"
A celebrity with 50 million followers may not always be the best choice for a specialised product. A smaller creator with a focused audience may generate more useful attention if their followers already care about the category.
This does not make celebrity marketing obsolete. Instead, it changes the role of the celebrity. A major star can create mass awareness while creators, experts and customers provide more detailed product information. The celebrity gets people interested. Other voices can help them decide.
Celebrity marketing has always carried reputation risk, but the speed of digital communication makes problems spread faster.
When a celebrity becomes involved in a controversy, the issue can quickly become connected with the brands they represent. This is one reason brands need to think carefully about the long-term relationship between a celebrity and their public image.
The risk is particularly high when the celebrity's personal reputation is central to the product's positioning. A short-term campaign may end, but old advertisements and social posts can remain online.
This means brands need to consider not only whether a celebrity is popular today but whether the association will still make sense several years later.
India has also strengthened the framework around misleading advertisements and endorsements.
The Central Consumer Protection Authority's 2022 guidelines require due diligence from endorsers. The government has stated that an endorsement should represent the endorser's genuine and reasonably current opinion and should be based on adequate information about or experience with the product or service. The guidelines also allow penalties for misleading advertisements and endorsements.
This changes the old idea that a celebrity can simply appear in an advertisement and leave the responsibility to the brand. The celebrity's credibility is part of the communication, so the claims being made through that credibility matter.
Categories involving food, health and nutrition require additional attention because misleading claims can have direct consequences for consumers. FSSAI maintains specific regulations governing advertising and claims for food products, including amendments to the Food Safety and Standards (Advertising and Claims) Regulations, 2018.
For celebrities, this means product selection and claim verification should happen before the campaign is filmed. The issue is not only legal compliance. It is also reputation. A celebrity who repeatedly associates their image with questionable claims can lose consumer trust across other partnerships as well.
Celebrity involvement can give a brand an advantage, but it cannot replace the work required to build a business.
A celebrity may help a product launch with enormous awareness, but customers still need to be able to buy it easily. A beauty product needs retail and digital availability. A fitness product needs distribution and inventory. A food product needs the right stores and supply chain.
Kay Beauty's expansion beyond its original online presence shows this clearly. The brand moved into general and modern trade after establishing itself online, expanding its physical availability across India. The celebrity helped attract attention, but distribution helped turn interest into actual access.
A product can be well made and heavily promoted but still struggle if the price does not match what consumers think it is worth. Celebrity branding sometimes creates a premium perception. That can help a product, but only when the consumer believes the premium is justified.
The product needs to offer something meaningful in return, whether that is better quality, design, performance, convenience, ingredients, service or a stronger experience. A famous name can support the positioning, but it cannot permanently justify an unreasonable price.
If removing the celebrity's photograph from the packaging leaves no clear reason to buy the product, the brand may have a problem. Consumers need to understand what makes the product different.
Kay Beauty built its positioning around makeup with a focus on performance, inclusivity and skincare-orientated ingredients. HRX built its identity around fitness and an active lifestyle. 82°E positions itself around simplified self-care, with products developed around a combination of traditional practices and modern formulation approaches. The celebrity creates recognition. The proposition creates a business.
The strongest change is not that celebrities are disappearing from advertising. It is that their role is becoming broader.
An endorser is mainly responsible for communication. A founder or investor has a longer relationship with the business. This can include product development, positioning, partnerships, launches and consumer communication.
Virat Kohli provides an example of this broader model through his investment and co-creator role with Agilitas Sports. In 2025, he became a co-investor and business partner in the company, with his One8 sportswear brand becoming part of the arrangement. In 2026, Anushka Sharma also acquired a minority stake and was set to co-develop a yoga-wear line under the One8 franchise.
This is a very different role from simply appearing in a sportswear advertisement.
Virat Kohli and Anushka Sharma also show how two individual celebrity identities can create a wider business story. Their public identities come from different industries, cricket and cinema, while their combined presence can appeal to consumers interested in lifestyle, fashion, fitness and family.
Their business activities have extended beyond their professional careers into investments and consumer-facing ventures. The larger point is that celebrity influence can become more useful when it is connected to actual participation in a business.
Repeated involvement gives a celebrity time to become associated with a brand's category and values. A one-day shoot can generate visibility. Years of involvement can create familiarity with the brand itself. That does not guarantee success, but it gives the audience more opportunities to understand why the celebrity is connected to the product.
It also gives the brand time to improve its offering based on customer feedback. This is where celebrity marketing begins to resemble brand building rather than traditional advertising.
The changing celebrity economy does not mean brands should stop working with Bollywood stars. It means they need to be more selective about what the star is expected to do.
Celebrity reach remains valuable when a brand needs rapid awareness. A major launch can benefit from a well-known actor because the celebrity can help the brand break through a crowded media environment.
But awareness should be treated as the starting point rather than the final goal. The campaign should move consumers towards understanding the product.
The next step is credibility. The celebrity should have a logical connection to the category, or the brand should provide enough evidence and information for consumers to evaluate the product independently. This is especially important when the product involves performance, health, money or long-term use.
A famous face can say that a product is good. The product itself needs to prove it.
This may be the simplest test for a celebrity-led business.
Ask:
Would consumers still want the product if the celebrity were removed from the advertisement? If the answer is yes, the celebrity is adding marketing power to a solid product.
If the answer is no, the business may be depending too heavily on fame. The strongest celebrity-led brands aim for the first outcome.
The celebrity gets the consumer to look. The product gives them a reason to buy. The experience gives them a reason to return.
Bollywood stars remain powerful marketing assets in India. A major celebrity can bring enormous attention to a product, help a launch reach a wider audience and give a new brand immediate recognition. But fame is no longer a complete business strategy.
Consumers can now look beyond the advertisement. They can test claims, compare products, read reviews and decide whether the product deserves their money. That has changed what successful celebrity branding needs to deliver.
Kay Beauty shows how a celebrity can move into a founder role and build a defined beauty proposition. HRX shows how an existing fitness identity can become a wider lifestyle business. 82°E shows how a celebrity can build a self-care brand around a stated philosophy and product development. Virat Kohli and Anushka Sharma's investment activities show another direction, where celebrity influence is combined with ownership and participation in business.
The old formula was simple: famous person + product = attention.
The newer formula is more demanding:
Famous person + credible connection + useful product + clear positioning + strong customer experience = a better chance of lasting success.
Bollywood fame can still open the door. It just cannot build the entire house.
Your information is safe with us