Discover Mrunal Thakur’s association with Ramsons Perfumes and its approach to modern perfume marketing. Explore their celebrity endorsement, fragrance campaigns, and how the partnership connects the brand with today’s perfume consumers.
Your information is safe with us
A perfume has an odd problem for an advertiser: the thing that defines it cannot be shown. A viewer can see a handbag's shape or a phone's screen, but a scent does not travel through a television or a phone. Fragrance brands therefore lean on everything around the scent, the setting, the styling, the packaging, and above all the person chosen to stand in for it.
In April 2026, Ramsons Perfumes made that choice publicly by naming Mrunal Thakur as its brand ambassador and the face of a new campaign. The pairing of Mrunal Thakur and Ramsons Perfumes is a useful case because the brand has been unusually direct about why it did it: it wants to be seen as a modern lifestyle brand rather than a purely functional fragrance label. The question is how a celebrity can help a fragrance brand build that identity when the product itself stays invisible.
The announcement, reported on 7 April 2026, described Mrunal Thakur as the brand ambassador and face of Ramsons' latest campaign. She will lead communication for the Ramsons fragrance portfolio, with a particular focus on the Exotica range. Coverage described the campaign as including digital content and integrated storytelling formats.
The company framed the move as a strategic shift. Reports said it marks Ramsons' transition from a utility-focused fragrance label towards a lifestyle brand, with a stated aim of positioning itself as modern, stylish, and accessible. That context matters. This is a recent appointment tied to a repositioning, not a long-running association, and the article treats it that way.
Ramsons' own language gives the clearest answer. Vrijesh Pandey, the brand's Group Chairman, said she "embodies the confidence and authenticity of today's Indian woman," and the announcement described her as representing the modern Indian woman: "confident, expressive, relatable, and aspirational."
Those four words are a brief for a particular kind of celebrity. Ramsons is aiming at a younger, digitally engaged audience, with trade coverage citing urban and emerging markets and an age range of 22 to 40. It also wants to sit between premium appeal and affordability. A celebrity who reads as both aspirational and relatable suits that balance better than one who reads as distant glamour.
Her own statement supports the same logic. She said she likes how Ramsons makes "world-class, premium fragrances accessible to everyone," and that the brand "believes confidence and self-expression should never feel out of reach." A spokesperson praising accessibility fits a brand trying to avoid feeling exclusive. It also shows why fit is different from fame: many actors are recognisable, but few have a public image that matches the specific tension Ramsons wants to resolve.
Public coverage of the launch is brief on creative detail, and this article stays within what it supports. The campaign introduced what was described as a refined visual narrative featuring Mrunal Thakur in minimal, sophisticated settings "that allow the fragrance experience to take centre stage."
That single description tells us a good deal about the strategy. Minimal settings reduce visual competition, so the attention falls on the person and the product. The phrase about letting the fragrance take centre stage signals that the brand wanted the scent to be the point, with the celebrity as the way into it. The focus on the Exotica range also gives the campaign a specific product to anchor the identity, since she named it as her personal favourite.
Coverage does not detail a storyline, tagline, music, or fragrance notes, so none are described here. The accurate summary is limited: a personality-led, minimalist visual campaign, centred on one named range, running across digital and other platforms as part of a wider brand repositioning.
A celebrity gives an unseen product a human reference point. Viewers cannot smell Exotica, but they can read a person: how she dresses, how she carries herself, what mood her image suggests. The brand then asks the audience to associate that mood with the fragrance.
The chain runs from celebrity image to visual storytelling to fragrance positioning to lifestyle association. It is a persuasion strategy, not proof of anything about the scent. Mrunal Thakur does not make a perfume modern on her own; she gives a brand that wants to be seen as modern a face consistent with that aim, while the repositioning itself depends on packaging, distribution, and product quality that an advertisement cannot supply.
For Ramsons, celebrity branding is tied to a broader plan. Coverage links the campaign to a move towards brand-led growth and digital-first expansion, particularly on e-commerce and quick-commerce platforms. In those channels a shopper often sees a small image and a name rather than testing the product, so a recognisable face can help a brand stand out and be remembered.
The celebrity supports the identity rather than replacing it. The brand's stated goals, accessibility, a modern feel, and trust, are product-and-brand goals; she is the vehicle for communicating them.
Ramsons describes her as both brand ambassador and face of the brand, with a remit across its fragrance portfolio and a special focus on Exotica. That is broader than a single-product endorsement, which suits a brand that wants one consistent personality across its range.
Because the appointment is recent, there is no track record to evaluate. A recurring association can create continuity across digital campaigns, social content, launches, and seasonal pushes, but whether that happens depends on what Ramsons does next, and this article does not assume it.
Fragrance advertising generally relies on visual cues: styling, setting, light, colour, pacing, packaging, and the celebrity's expression. Of these, only the setting is documented for this campaign, and it is minimal and sophisticated.
Minimalism is itself a signal. Clean, uncluttered visuals tend to suggest refinement and let a single idea dominate. It is reasonable to say this supports Ramsons' "modern and stylish" aim, but it is interpretation, and viewers will not all read the same cues in the same way. What the visuals can do is suggest an intended personality; they cannot convey the scent.
Mrunal Thakur's image shapes the visual and emotional direction of the campaign, but she does not define what the perfume smells like or how it performs. The relationship runs from persona to positioning to styling to intended audience to brand perception. Ramsons' stated audience, younger and digitally engaged, is the one her public image is described as suiting, which is what makes the pairing coherent rather than arbitrary.
Because shoppers cannot evaluate scent through an ad, the choice of celebrity carries extra weight in differentiating one brand from another. In a crowded category, a person whose image matches the brand's aim gives it a recognisable identity across channels. If the face and the positioning were mismatched, say a glamour-first celebrity fronting a brand promising accessibility, the message would feel inconsistent. Here, accessibility and relatability appear in both the brand's language and her own.
A perfume advertisement needs a recognisable personality and a clear product identity. Ramsons' communication names a specific range and a specific positioning, mass-premium and accessible, alongside the celebrity. Her endorsement is not evidence that any fragrance is longer-lasting, more attractive, or better suited to a particular buyer. Those claims would belong to the brand, and none are made in the available coverage.
Several lessons follow. Celebrity selection works best when it answers a specific brand problem, here, moving from utility to lifestyle. Visual restraint can keep the product central when the celebrity is highly recognisable. A named range gives a brand-level ambassador something concrete to represent. And a recent appointment should be judged on its logic and stated goals rather than on results that do not yet exist.
The Mrunal Thakur and Ramsons Perfumes association shows how celebrity appeal can give a fragrance brand a more recognisable and contemporary identity, while visual storytelling and product presentation remain essential to communicating the fragrance itself. Her image, described by the brand as confident, expressive, relatable, and aspirational, matches Ramsons' aim to appear modern while staying accessible, and the minimalist campaign was designed to keep the fragrance at its centre.
For fragrance brands, the takeaway is that the right celebrity can provide a familiar face and a clear personality for the product, but the strongest communication still connects that personality to the fragrance's own identity.
Your information is safe with us